Sunday, June 28, 2009

The irony! It burns!

Why is it that religious conservatives (Liberals, Republicans, Fielding...) who continue to say that "the science is out on climate change"-defying the consensus of 2000+ scientists-never apply their skeptical and inquisitive nature to their own religious beliefs? As Field Marshal Editor so brilliantly put:
If only the AGW model was proposed in a collection of 2000-year-old texts of dubious authorship. That way there would be enough evidence.
at

3 comments:

  1. AnonymousJune 28, 2009 at 9:56 PM

    Amen, comrades.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Iain HallJune 29, 2009 at 4:46 PM

    Really Tom you need to get a much wider Blog diet, when it comes to the issue of AGW.
    Scott Bridges knows stuff all about the topic and is incapable a a single original thought on the matter.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Private 'Baldrick' TomJune 30, 2009 at 6:51 PM

    Good to see you both back, boys. Iain, the crux of the post that the irony and hypocrisy of religion folk refusing to consider the claims of 2000+ scientists whilst believing in entities for which there is not one iota of evidence. Heck, at least you're a skeptic on both issues.

    ReplyDelete